Dynamics GP to Dynamics 365 Data Migration

Move from Dynamics GP to Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations or Business Central with AI-powered automation. Mine handles the schema translation between GP's Dexterity-based architecture and D365's Dataverse model.

Working with enterprise teams on active migration programs

mine — Microsoft Dynamics GPMicrosoft Dynamics 365
SourceTarget
RM00101 (Customer Master)Customer Entity / Account
PM00200 (Vendor Master)Vendor Entity
GL00100 (Account Master)Chart of Accounts / Main Account
GL20000/GL30000 (GL Transactions)General Journal
SOP10100/SOP30200 (Sales Orders)Sales Order / Sales Invoice
+6 more objects mapped94% avg confidence
See full mapping →

4–8 weeks

to production-ready mappings

40–50%

cost reduction vs. manual migration

90%+

average mapping confidence

Most enterprise migrations start 6+ months behind schedule. Yours doesn't have to.

This guide is for VPs of IT, data architects, and migration leads at companies moving data from Microsoft Dynamics GP to Microsoft Dynamics 365 — whether you're scoping, planning, or mid-program.

Dynamics GP uses a proprietary Dexterity-based SQL Server schema with cryptic table names (RM00101 for customers, PM00200 for vendors, GL00100 for accounts) and a flat, wide-table design, while Dynamics 365 uses the Dataverse entity model or X++ data entities. Mine translates GP's legacy naming conventions to D365's modern entity framework automatically.

Based on enterprise migration programs led by Mine's founding team

Last updated March 2026

How Mine automates your Microsoft Dynamics GP to Microsoft Dynamics 365 migration

  • Mine auto-maps GP's cryptic table names (RM00101, PM00200, GL00100) to their D365 entity equivalents with field-level mapping — including GP's obscure column names like CUSTNMBR, VENDORID, and ACTINDX.

  • GP's work/open/history table split (GL20000 for current, GL30000 for history) is detected automatically. Mine generates migration rules that unify the data into D365's single-ledger model with proper period assignments.

  • Third-party ISV tables are profiled alongside GP core tables. Mine flags tables that belong to ISV modules (Mekorma, Binary Stream, SalesPad) and separates them from standard migration scope.

  • Mine validates the full GL-to-subledger reconciliation after migration — ensuring AR, AP, and inventory subsidiary balances match the general ledger in D365.

See how Mine works end-to-end →
Microsoft Dynamics GPMicrosoft Dynamics 365 mapping
Mine mapping review showing AI-generated field mappings with confidence scores for Microsoft Dynamics GP to Microsoft Dynamics 365 migration

Get your Microsoft Dynamics GP to Microsoft Dynamics 365 mapping analysis — see results in under an hour

Migration timeline: manual vs. Mine

Traditional approach

Timeline

6–12 months

Estimated cost

$300K–1.5M

Team size

4–8 consultants

Typically requires

×Manual field mapping in spreadsheets

×Custom ABAP/SQL extraction scripts

×3–5 mock migration cycles

×Dedicated source system consultants

×Manual reconciliation testing

With Mine

Enterprise benchmarks

Timeline

4–8 weeks

Team size

1–2 internal resources

Estimated cost

40–50% less

Included

Schema profiling & analysis

AI-generated field mappings

Transformation SQL

Validation & readiness reports

Production-ready load files

Common challenges migrating from Microsoft Dynamics GP to Microsoft Dynamics 365

GP's cryptic table naming to D365 entities

Dynamics GP uses non-descriptive table names inherited from its Dexterity origins — RM00101 (Customer Master), PM00200 (Vendor Master), GL00100 (Account Master), SOP10100 (Sales Transaction Work). Dynamics 365 uses descriptive entity names. Mapping between the two requires a crosswalk that covers hundreds of tables, and GP's documentation is notoriously sparse.

Explore related migrations →

Choosing the right D365 target: F&O vs. Business Central

Companies must decide between Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations (enterprise-grade, X++ data model) and Business Central (mid-market, AL-based extensions). The data migration path differs significantly for each. Mine helps by profiling your GP data complexity to recommend the appropriate target and generating mappings specific to that platform.

Explore related migrations →

Historical transaction migration and sub-ledger detail

GP stores financial history across work, open, and history tables (GL20000 for open year, GL30000 for history). Dynamics 365 uses different period-close and fiscal calendar models. Deciding how much history to migrate — and ensuring sub-ledger to GL reconciliation survives the transition — is a major decision point.

Explore related migrations →

GP customizations and third-party ISV data

Most GP installations include third-party ISV modules (Mekorma for payments, Binary Stream for multi-entity, SalesPad for order management) that store data in custom tables alongside GP's core schema. These tables have no D365 equivalent and require individual analysis to determine what migrates, what gets archived, and what gets rebuilt.

Explore related migrations →

Microsoft Dynamics GP to Microsoft Dynamics 365 field mapping — what data moves

11 data objects typically migrated

Source ObjectTarget Object
RM00101 (Customer Master)Customer Entity / Account
PM00200 (Vendor Master)Vendor Entity
GL00100 (Account Master)Chart of Accounts / Main Account
GL20000/GL30000 (GL Transactions)General Journal
SOP10100/SOP30200 (Sales Orders)Sales Order / Sales Invoice
POP10100/POP30100 (Purchase Orders)Purchase Order
RM20101 (AR Open)Customer Ledger Entry
PM20000 (AP Open)Vendor Ledger Entry
IV00101/IV00102 (Item Master)Item / Released Product
UPR00100 (Employee Master)Employee / Worker
SY01200 (Addresses)Party Addresses

Typical enterprise migrations include 500K–10M+ records across these objects. Mine handles profiling and mapping at any scale.

The cost of manual Microsoft Dynamics GP to Microsoft Dynamics 365 migration

Microsoft offers migration toolkits and ISV solutions (like eOne SmartConnect or Binary Stream), but these handle only standard modules. Companies with customized GP installations — which is virtually all of them — still face significant manual mapping, especially for modified reports, custom Dexterity tables, and third-party ISV data.

Explore all migration paths →

Frequently asked questions

Yes. Mine generates different mappings depending on your D365 target. F&O uses X++ data entities with a different schema than Business Central's AL-based tables. You select the target during setup and Mine adapts the mapping accordingly.

In one enterprise migration, a single field mapping error in customer master data caused $100K in billing discrepancies that went undetected for 6 months.

Mine catches these issues before they reach production.

Built by a team that led SAP, Oracle, and Salesforce data migration programs for Fortune 500 companies at a Big 4 consulting firm. Currently in design partnership with enterprise clients running active migration programs.

Ready to migrate from Microsoft Dynamics GP to Microsoft Dynamics 365?

Tell us about your migration and we'll show you how Mine can help.

No commitment required. We'll review your migration scope and share a preliminary assessment within 48 hours.

✓ No credit card✓ 48-hour response✓ Free initial assessment

You'll receive a preliminary mapping analysis showing how your source objects map to your target schema, with confidence scores and flagged risk areas.

Or book a demo call →